Association of HLA Phenotype with Primary Non-response to Recombinant Hepatitis B Vaccine: A Study from North India

Kunal Das, R.K. Gupta, V. Kumar, Sanjay Singh, P.Kar

 

Introduction

Hepatitis B vaccination has been one of the success stories in the prevention of hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection and related complications. Recombinant hepatitis B vaccine is highly immunogenic and has a good safety record in various countries around the world including India.1-4 Most studies have found the primary non response rate to recombinant hepatitis B vaccination to range between 5% and 10%. Factors that have been linked to non-response include age, sex, obesity, smoking, diabetes and chronic renal failure.1,4,5-7 But these factors alone cannot explain all causes of non-response. It has been suggested that non-response may be related to certain human leucocyte antigen (HLA) phenotypes such as DR4, DR7, FC31, B44, DQ3 etc.8-11 This is because the immune response to the virus has been found to be influenced by HLA phenotypes.14-16 Ethnic differences in HLA Phenotypes are responsible for non-responsiveness to hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) has been documented in the literatre.17 Since HLA phenotypes of Indians have been found to be different from those of both Causcasians and orientals,18 we decided to design a study to characterize to the HLA phenotypes associated with non-responsiveness to hepatitis B vaccination in Indian population.

Materials and Methods

The study was conducted at the L.N.Hospital, New Delhi during April 1998 to March 1999. A total of 107 healthy volunteers were selected from 387 healthy non-obese non-smokers attending the medical outpatient services using the random sampling method. The volunteers were re-tested for markers of HBV infection. The 102 volunteers negative for hepatitis B infection agreed to participate. The serological tests in the study included HBsAg (Ranbaxy Diagnostics, Bombay, India). IgG anti-HBe (Meltec, Spain), anti Hbs (AUSAB, Abbot Lab USA) and anti-HBc (Melotec, Spain) using commercially available ELISA kits. Among the 102 volunteers who completed the trial, there were 87 responders (age and sex matches) were included in the study using the random sampling method after obtaining informed consent. The schedule of the recombinant HBV vaccine was 0, 1 and 6 months. 

Testing for anti-HBs antibody titres was done on days 90 and 210 after administration of first vaccine dose. Non-responders were defined as volunteers with anti-HBs antibody global mean titres (GMT) <10mlU/ml at day 210. HLA A/B/C/D typing was carried out by standard microlymphotoxicity tests. All the volunteers were administered a questionnaire and those positive for known factors that could confound the rate of response were not included. Statistical analysis was done using the standard student’s and Chi-square test test with Yates correction. 

Results

The average age of the responders was 44.6 ± 6.9 years. The male-to-female ratio in the responder population was 4:1 while in the non-responder population it was 8:7. Table 1 shows the frequency of specific HLA types among responders and non-responders. Haplotypes with the highest frequencies among non responders (compared to responders) were HLA A1 and B15 (5-times) following by B40 (3 times), and A10 and DQ2 (2.5 times). DR 52 was present in a frequency of 11/15 (73.3%) in equal measure in both groups. HLA A1 and B15 were present among 5/15 of the non-responders (33.3%) but only 1/15 of the responder population (6.7%). HLA DR53 was more frequent in the non-responders (7/15, 46.7%) compared to the responders (5/15, 33.3%). The most common HLA phenotypes in the responder population were HLA – A11, C3, DR10 and DR51. These differences in frequencies were however non-significant (p>0.05).


Discussion


On the basis of HLA phenotypes, Indians occupy a middle position between Caucasians and Orientals. This conclusion is based on the findings of HLA phenotype studies conducted in India as well on Indians in other countries. Indians have patterns similar to Causcasians for HLA phenotypes A1,A3,A7,6b and A8; HLA A2 and 6a are lower among Indians while HLA A9, Lc17, AS and D-66 are higher among Indians compared to Jews or Japanese.18-21 HLA A1, A3, A9 amd A5 are observed with increased frequency in Indian population.18-19 A2 is significantly lower while similar frequencies occurred for HLA A7, Lc17, 6b and A8. Further, HLA W19. (Thomson factor) was  also    absent in our study group.18-21 Previous investigations have correlated the non-response to hepatitis B vaccinein Caucasions to extended haplotypes B44, DR7, FC31 and B8 10, 17, 20,23, 25 and reported an increased prevalence of HLA A1, DQ2, DQ3, DR3, B44, B15, DR4 and DR53 in responders. In our study, response to hepatitis B vaccinations was associated with certain HLA phenotypes such as HLA A1, DQ2 and B15 as reported by other investigators. HLA B40 and A10 haplotypes was associated with non-response to vaccination in our subjects, which has not been reported from the west. Interestingly, certain HLA  phenotypes such as DR4, DR7 and DQ3 were found to be lower in our non-responder population, but have been reported in other ethnic among non responders to hepatitis B vaccination.3,8,17,25 Some of the haplotypes such as HLA 44 and B46, which have been described among non-responders by other investigations, 24 were absent in our population. Also, there certain haplotypes such as A10 and DR3 which were found with increased frequency among non-responders in our study group but were not reported by other investigators. So far, HLA B40 and A10 studies to identify the relationship between HLA phenotypes and deseases such as tuberculosis and Kalazar26, 27 in an Indian population have not yielded any specific haplotype associated among individuals.

Table 1 : Selected HLA Phenotypes in responder and non-responder populations.
HLA Types Responder (n=15) Non-responder (=15)
A1 1 (6.7) 5 (33)
A10 2 (13.3) 5 (33)
A11 6 (40) 4 (26.7)
B8 1 (6.7) 3 (20)
B15 1 (6.7) 5 (33)
B40 1 (6.7) 3 (20)
C3 8 (53.8) 4 (26.7)
B4/B6 15 (100) 15 (100)
DQ2 2 (13.3) 5 (33)
DQ6 3 (20) 1 (6.7)
DR10 3 (20) 1 (6.7)
DR51 4 (26.7) 1 (6.7)
DR52 11 (73.3) 11 (73.3)
DR53 5 (33) 7 (46.7)

                            Values in parentheses are percentages

Our Study revealed certain interesting observations that lead us to believe that certain haplotypes such as HLA A1, B8, B15 and Bq12, which have been recognized as universal, do occur in an Indian poulation and may be associated with non-responsiveness to HBV vaccination. At the same time, certain other haplotypes such as HLA B40 and A10 were also detected among non-responder to HLA vaccination, which has not been observed earlier. These results emphasize the need for larger studies to study HLA phenotypes with respect to responders and non-responder in different ethnic groups within the Indian population.


References

  1. Westmoreland D, Player V, Heap DC, Hammond A. Immunization against hepatitis B: what can we expect? Epidemiol Infect 1990;104:499-509
  2. Dienstag JL, Werner BG, Polk BF, Snydman DR, Craven DE, Platt R. Hepatitis B in health care personnel: safely, immunogenicity and indicators of efficiency. Ann Intern Med 1984;101:34-40.
  3. Craven DE, Awden ZL, Kunches LM, Yunis EJ, Dienstag JL, Werner BG. Nnresponsivencess to hepatitis B vaccine in health care workers. Ann Inter Med 1986;105:356-60.
  4. Wood RC, MacDonald KL, White KE, Hedberg W, Hanson M, Osterholm MT. Risk factors for lack of detectable antibody response following hepatitis B vaccination of Minnesota Health care workers. JAMA 1993;270:2935-9
  5. Bortolotti F, Crivellaro C, Pornaro E, Realdi G. Hepatitis b in a non-responder to hepatitis b Vaccine. Infection 1988;16:119-20.
  6. Centers for Disease Control. Inadequate immune response among public safety workers receiving interdermal vaccination against hepatitis B. United States 1990-91. J Am Med Assoc 1991;266:1338-9.
  7. Douvin C, Simon D, Charles MA et al. Hepatitis B vaccination in diabetic patients: Randomised trail comparing recombinant vaccines containing and not containing pre s2 antigen. Diabetes Care 1997;20:148-51.
  8. Alper CA, Kruskall MS, Marcus-Begley D, et al. Genetic predication of non-response to hepatitis B vaccine. New Engl J Med 1989;321:708-12
  9. McDermott AB, Zuckermann JN, Sabin CA Marsh SGE, Madrigal JA. Contribution of human leukocyte antigens to antibody response to hepatitis B vaccination. Tissue Antigens 1997;50:8-14.
  10. Varla Leftherioti M, Papanicolaou M, Spyropopulu M et al. HLA associated non-responsiveness to hepatitis B vaccine. Tissue Antigens 1990;35:60-3
  11. Halae K, Kimura A, Okubo R et al. Genetic control of non-responsiveness to Hepatitis B virus vaccine by an extended haplotype Eur J Immunol 1992;22:1899-905.
  12. McDevitt EO & Sela M. Genetic control of antibody response.I Demontration of determinant-specific differences in responses to synthetic polypeptide antigens in two strains of inbred mice. J Exp Med 1965;122:517-31.
  13. Klein J. Genetic control of immune response. New concepts and old misconception. J Pediatric 1987;111:996-9.
  14. Petterson MJ,Hourani MR, Mayor G. HLA antigents and Hepatitis B virus. N Engl JMed 1997;297:1124.
  15. Giani G, Chiaramonte M, Pasini CV, Fagiolo U, Naccrato R. Hepatitis B surface antigenemia and HLA antigens. N Engl J Med 1979;300:1056
  16. Van Hattum J, Schreuder GM, Schalm SW. HLA antigens in-patients with various courses after hepatitis B virus infection. Hepatology 1987;7:11-4.
  17. Stachowski J, Kramer J, Fust G, Maciejewski J, Baldanus CA, Ptrangi GG. Relationship between the reactivity to hepatitis B virus vaccination and the frequency of MHC class I, II and III alleles in haemodialysis patients. Scand J
    Immuno 1995;42:60-5.
  18. Mehta MM, Contractor NM, Bhatia HM. Incidence of leucocyte antibodies and HLA antigens in Bombay population. Ind J Med Sci 1975;29:213-6.
  19. National Institute of Health. Catalogue of tissue typing antisera. Bethesda Maryland: Transplantation and immunology branch. Collaborative Research National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases. National Institute of Health;1971.
  20. Singhal DP. The distribution of HLA leucocyte antigens in Indians. Dausset J, Colombani J (eds) Histocompatibility testing: 179-186. Munsgaard;Copen Hagen 1972.
  21. Brain P, Hammond MG. Frequency of HLA antigens in South Africa Bantu, Indians and Caucasians: Dusset J, Colombani J (eds) Histocompatibility testing 433-9. Munsgaard, Copenhagen 1972.
  22. Walker M, Szmuness W, Stevens CE, et al. Genetics of anti-HBs responsiveness to HLA DRY and non-responsiveness to hepatitis b vaccination. Transfusion 1981;21:601-6.
  23. Watanabe H, Matsushita S, Kamikawaji N, Hirayana K, Kumara N, Sasazuki T. Immune suppression agene on HLA BW54, DR 4. DRW53 type controls non-responsiveness in humans to hepatitis B surface antigen CD8 + suppressor T cue. Human Immunol 1988;22:9-17.
  24. Chion SS, Yamachi K, Nakanishi T. nature of immunological non-responsiveness to hepatitis B vaccine in healthy indiduals. Immunology 1988;64:545-50.
  25. Yap I, Chan SH. A new pre-s containing recombinant hepatitis B vaccine and its effect on non-responders: a preliminary observation. Ann Acad Med 1996;25:120-2.
  26. Ghosal AG, Mandal TK, Chowdhary TK, Mukherjee K, Mukherjee D. HLA phenotype frequencies in pulmonary tuberculosis. J Indian Med Assoc 1996;94:328-30.
  27. Singh N, Sunder S, Williams F, et al. Molecular typing of HLA class I and class II antigens in Indian Kala Azar patients. Trop Med Intern Health 1996;25:120-2.
 

Back